TildAlice

Part 6: Beyond Simulation: Addressing the Sim-to-Real Gap

,
Updated Feb 6, 2026

Introduction

In the previous five episodes of this series, we explored the foundations of reinforcement learning—from MDPs and custom Gym environments to policy gradient methods, Stable Baselines3, and reward engineering. Now we face the ultimate challenge: deploying RL policies in the real world.

Simulation is where most RL breakthroughs happen. It’s safe, fast, and cheap. But policies trained in simulation often fail catastrophically when deployed on real robots, trading systems, or industrial equipment. This phenomenon is known as the sim-to-real gap.

In this final episode, we’ll explore why this gap exists, techniques to bridge it (domain randomization, system identification, transfer learning), and real-world deployment considerations for both robotics and financial applications. We’ll also look at emerging approaches like world models and offline RL that promise safer, more robust real-world deployment.

The Sim-to-Real Gap: Why Policies Fail in Reality

The sim-to-real gap arises from discrepancies between simulation and reality across multiple dimensions:

Dimension Simulation Reality
Physics Perfect equations, no friction modeling errors Complex contact dynamics, wear, temperature effects
Sensing Noise-free observations Sensor noise, occlusions, calibration drift
Actuation Instantaneous, precise control Latency, backlash, actuator limits
Dynamics Deterministic or controlled stochastic Unmodeled disturbances, regime shifts
Visual Simplified textures, lighting Complex lighting, reflections, motion blur

Example: Robot Grasping

Consider a robotic arm trained in simulation to grasp objects:

  • In simulation: The gripper closes with perfect force control, the object has known mass and friction coefficients, vision provides clean RGB-D data.
  • In reality: Gripper force sensors are noisy, objects slip due to unmodeled surface properties, lighting changes affect vision, and cable stiffness creates unexpected forces.

The policy overfits to the simulator’s idealized physics and fails when these assumptions break.

Example: Algorithmic Trading

A trading agent trained on historical backtests:

  • In simulation: Perfect execution at closing prices, no slippage, infinite liquidity.
  • In reality: Orders take time to fill, prices move against you (slippage), market microstructure matters, and regime changes (e.g., COVID-19) invalidate historical patterns.

The policy learns to exploit backtesting artifacts rather than robust market inefficiencies.

Domain Randomization: Embracing Uncertainty

Domain randomization (DR) is a simple yet powerful technique: randomize simulation parameters during training so the policy learns to be robust to variation. When deployed to the real world, reality is just another sample from the randomized distribution.

What to Randomize

  1. Physics parameters: Mass, friction, damping, restitution coefficients
  2. Visual appearance: Textures, colors, lighting, camera position
  3. Dynamics: Actuator gains, time delays, action noise
  4. Environmental factors: Object positions, sizes, external forces

Implementation Example

Let’s randomize a simple CartPole environment:

import gymnasium as gym
import numpy as np
from gymnasium.wrappers import TimeLimit

class RandomizedCartPoleEnv(gym.Wrapper):
    """
    Domain randomization wrapper for CartPole.
    Randomizes pole length, mass, and friction on each episode reset.
    """
    def __init__(self, env):
        super().__init__(env)
        # Store default parameters
        self.default_length = self.env.unwrapped.length
        self.default_masspole = self.env.unwrapped.masspole
        self.default_friction = self.env.unwrapped.tau  # Friction approximation

    def reset(self, **kwargs):
        # Randomize pole length ±30%
        self.env.unwrapped.length = self.default_length * np.random.uniform(0.7, 1.3)

        # Randomize pole mass ±50%
        self.env.unwrapped.masspole = self.default_masspole * np.random.uniform(0.5, 1.5)

        # Randomize friction ±20%
        self.env.unwrapped.tau = self.default_friction * np.random.uniform(0.8, 1.2)

        # Update derived quantities
        self.env.unwrapped.total_mass = (self.env.unwrapped.masspole + 
                                         self.env.unwrapped.masscart)
        self.env.unwrapped.polemass_length = (self.env.unwrapped.masspole * 
                                              self.env.unwrapped.length)

        return self.env.reset(**kwargs)

# Usage with Stable Baselines3
from stable_baselines3 import PPO

env = RandomizedCartPoleEnv(gym.make('CartPole-v1'))
model = PPO('MlpPolicy', env, verbose=1)
model.learn(total_timesteps=50000)

Visual Domain Randomization for Vision-Based Tasks

For robotic vision tasks, randomize textures, lighting, and backgrounds:

import cv2
import numpy as np

class VisualRandomizationWrapper(gym.ObservationWrapper):
    """
    Randomizes brightness, contrast, and adds noise to image observations.
    """
    def observation(self, obs):
        # Assume obs is RGB image (H, W, 3)
        img = obs.astype(np.float32)

        # Random brightness adjustment ±30%
        brightness = np.random.uniform(0.7, 1.3)
        img *= brightness

        # Random contrast adjustment ±20%
        contrast = np.random.uniform(0.8, 1.2)
        img = (img - 128) * contrast + 128

        # Add Gaussian noise
        noise = np.random.normal(0, 5, img.shape)
        img += noise

        # Clip to valid range
        img = np.clip(img, 0, 255).astype(np.uint8)

        return img

When Domain Randomization Works

  • Large randomization range: The real-world parameters fall within the randomized distribution.
  • Sufficient training data: The policy sees enough diversity to generalize.
  • Smooth policies: The task allows robust, conservative strategies (e.g., grasping with higher force margin).

Limitations

  • Over-conservatism: Policies may become overly cautious, sacrificing performance.
  • Sample inefficiency: Training on diverse scenarios requires more data.
  • Unknown unknowns: You can only randomize what you anticipate varying.

System Identification: Calibrating the Simulator

Instead of randomizing, we can calibrate the simulator to match reality using real-world data. This is called system identification.

The Process

  1. Collect real-world trajectory data: Execute actions on the real system, record states.
  2. Define parameterized simulator: Create a simulator with tunable parameters θ\theta (e.g., friction coefficient μ\mu, damping bb).
  3. Optimize parameters: Minimize the difference between simulated and real trajectories:

θ∗=arg⁡min⁡θ∑t=1T∥streal−stsim(θ)∥2\theta^* = \arg\min_{\theta} \sum_{t=1}^{T} \| s_t^{\text{real}} – s_t^{\text{sim}}(\theta) \|^2

Where:
– θ∗\theta^* = optimal simulator parameters
– streals_t^{\text{real}} = real-world state at time tt
– stsim(θ)s_t^{\text{sim}}(\theta) = simulated state with parameters θ\theta
– TT = trajectory length

Example: Calibrating a Pendulum Simulator

import numpy as np
from scipy.optimize import minimize

class PendulumSimulator:
    """Simple pendulum simulator with tunable damping."""
    def __init__(self, damping=0.1, length=1.0, mass=1.0, dt=0.01):
        self.damping = damping  # Tunable parameter
        self.length = length
        self.mass = mass
        self.g = 9.81
        self.dt = dt

    def step(self, theta, theta_dot, torque):
        """Simulate one step. Returns next (theta, theta_dot)."""
        # Equation of motion: theta_ddot = (torque - damping*theta_dot - m*g*L*sin(theta)) / (m*L^2)
        theta_ddot = (torque - self.damping * theta_dot - 
                      self.mass * self.g * self.length * np.sin(theta)) / (self.mass * self.length**2)

        theta_dot_new = theta_dot + theta_ddot * self.dt
        theta_new = theta + theta_dot_new * self.dt

        return theta_new, theta_dot_new

    def simulate_trajectory(self, initial_state, actions):
        """Simulate full trajectory given initial state and action sequence."""
        theta, theta_dot = initial_state
        states = [(theta, theta_dot)]

        for action in actions:
            theta, theta_dot = self.step(theta, theta_dot, action)
            states.append((theta, theta_dot))

        return np.array(states)

def calibrate_damping(real_trajectory, actions, initial_state):
    """
    Find optimal damping parameter that matches real trajectory.

    Args:
        real_trajectory: (T+1, 2) array of (theta, theta_dot) from real system
        actions: (T,) array of torques applied
        initial_state: (theta_0, theta_dot_0)
    """
    def loss(damping):
        sim = PendulumSimulator(damping=damping[0])
        sim_trajectory = sim.simulate_trajectory(initial_state, actions)
        return np.sum((real_trajectory - sim_trajectory)**2)

    result = minimize(loss, x0=[0.1], bounds=[(0.0, 1.0)], method='L-BFGS-B')
    return result.x[0]

# Example usage
real_trajectory = np.load('real_pendulum_trajectory.npy')  # From real robot
actions = np.load('pendulum_actions.npy')
initial_state = real_trajectory[0]

optimal_damping = calibrate_damping(real_trajectory, actions, initial_state)
print(f"Optimal damping coefficient: {optimal_damping:.4f}")

Advanced: Bayesian System Identification

Use Bayesian optimization to handle noisy observations and uncertainty quantification:

from skopt import gp_minimize
from skopt.space import Real

def bayesian_calibrate(real_trajectory, actions, initial_state):
    """
    Bayesian optimization for system identification.
    Returns distribution over parameters, not just point estimate.
    """
    space = [Real(0.0, 1.0, name='damping'),
             Real(0.5, 1.5, name='length')]

    def objective(params):
        damping, length = params
        sim = PendulumSimulator(damping=damping, length=length)
        sim_trajectory = sim.simulate_trajectory(initial_state, actions)
        return np.sum((real_trajectory - sim_trajectory)**2)

    result = gp_minimize(objective, space, n_calls=50, random_state=42)
    return result.x  # [optimal_damping, optimal_length]

Transfer Learning Approaches

When the sim-to-real gap is large, we can use transfer learning: start with a policy trained in simulation, then adapt it using limited real-world data.

Fine-Tuning

The simplest approach: continue training the simulated policy on real-world data.

from stable_baselines3 import SAC

# Step 1: Train in simulation
sim_env = gym.make('Pendulum-v1')
sim_model = SAC('MlpPolicy', sim_env, verbose=1)
sim_model.learn(total_timesteps=100000)

# Step 2: Fine-tune on real robot (assuming real_env wrapper exists)
real_env = RealPendulumEnv()  # Connects to actual hardware
sim_model.set_env(real_env)
sim_model.learn(total_timesteps=5000)  # Limited real-world data
sim_model.save('fine_tuned_policy')

Challenges:
– Risk of catastrophic forgetting (losing simulation knowledge)
– Real-world data collection is expensive and risky

Progressive Neural Networks

Progressive nets freeze the simulation policy and add new “columns” for real-world adaptation, preventing forgetting:

import torch
import torch.nn as nn

class ProgressiveNet(nn.Module):
    """
    Two-column progressive network.
    Column 1 (frozen): trained in simulation
    Column 2 (trainable): adapts to real world using lateral connections
    """
    def __init__(self, obs_dim, act_dim, hidden_dim=64):
        super().__init__()

        # Column 1: Simulation policy (frozen)
        self.sim_fc1 = nn.Linear(obs_dim, hidden_dim)
        self.sim_fc2 = nn.Linear(hidden_dim, hidden_dim)
        self.sim_fc3 = nn.Linear(hidden_dim, act_dim)

        # Column 2: Real-world policy (trainable)
        self.real_fc1 = nn.Linear(obs_dim, hidden_dim)
        self.real_fc2 = nn.Linear(hidden_dim * 2, hidden_dim)  # Lateral connection from col1
        self.real_fc3 = nn.Linear(hidden_dim * 2, act_dim)     # Lateral connection from col1

        # Freeze simulation column
        for param in [self.sim_fc1, self.sim_fc2, self.sim_fc3]:
            param.requires_grad = False

    def forward(self, x, use_real=True):
        # Column 1 forward pass (always computed)
        h1_sim = torch.relu(self.sim_fc1(x))
        h2_sim = torch.relu(self.sim_fc2(h1_sim))

        if not use_real:
            return torch.tanh(self.sim_fc3(h2_sim))

        # Column 2 forward pass with lateral connections
        h1_real = torch.relu(self.real_fc1(x))
        h2_real = torch.relu(self.real_fc2(torch.cat([h1_real, h1_sim], dim=-1)))
        action = torch.tanh(self.real_fc3(torch.cat([h2_real, h2_sim], dim=-1)))

        return action

Domain Adaptation with Adversarial Training

Train a domain discriminator to make simulation and real-world state distributions indistinguishable:

Ltotal=LRL−λLdiscriminator\mathcal{L}_{\text{total}} = \mathcal{L}_{\text{RL}} – \lambda \mathcal{L}_{\text{discriminator}}

Where:
– LRL\mathcal{L}_{\text{RL}} = standard RL loss (policy gradient, Q-learning)
– Ldiscriminator\mathcal{L}_{\text{discriminator}} = binary classification loss (sim vs real)
– λ\lambda = adversarial loss weight

The policy learns features that work in both domains by fooling the discriminator.

Real-World Deployment Considerations

Safety Constraints

Real systems can be damaged. Use constrained RL or safety wrappers:

class SafetyWrapper(gym.ActionWrapper):
    """
    Clips actions and enforces joint limits for robot safety.
    """
    def __init__(self, env, max_joint_velocity=1.0, forbidden_zones=None):
        super().__init__(env)
        self.max_velocity = max_joint_velocity
        self.forbidden_zones = forbidden_zones or []  # List of (min, max) tuples

    def action(self, act):
        # Clip velocities
        act = np.clip(act, -self.max_velocity, self.max_velocity)

        # Check forbidden zones (e.g., collision regions)
        current_pos = self.env.unwrapped.robot.get_joint_positions()
        for i, (min_pos, max_pos) in enumerate(self.forbidden_zones):
            if min_pos <= current_pos[i] <= max_pos:
                act[i] = 0.0  # Stop motion in forbidden zone

        return act

Action Smoothing

RL policies can produce jerky actions. Apply exponential smoothing:

class ActionSmoothingWrapper(gym.ActionWrapper):
    """
    Exponential moving average smoothing for actions.
    """
    def __init__(self, env, alpha=0.3):
        super().__init__(env)
        self.alpha = alpha  # Smoothing factor (0 = all previous, 1 = all current)
        self.prev_action = None

    def action(self, act):
        if self.prev_action is None:
            self.prev_action = act

        # Exponential smoothing: a_smooth = alpha * a_current + (1 - alpha) * a_prev
        smoothed = self.alpha * act + (1 - self.alpha) * self.prev_action
        self.prev_action = smoothed

        return smoothed

    def reset(self, **kwargs):
        self.prev_action = None
        return self.env.reset(**kwargs)

Latency Handling

Real systems have observation and actuation delays. Model latency explicitly:

from collections import deque

class LatencyWrapper(gym.Wrapper):
    """
    Simulates observation and action latency.
    """
    def __init__(self, env, obs_delay=2, act_delay=1):
        super().__init__(env)
        self.obs_delay = obs_delay  # Steps of observation delay
        self.act_delay = act_delay  # Steps of action delay

        self.obs_buffer = deque(maxlen=obs_delay + 1)
        self.act_buffer = deque(maxlen=act_delay + 1)

    def reset(self, **kwargs):
        obs, info = self.env.reset(**kwargs)
        self.obs_buffer.clear()
        self.act_buffer.clear()

        # Fill buffers with initial state
        for _ in range(self.obs_delay + 1):
            self.obs_buffer.append(obs)

        return self.obs_buffer[0], info  # Return delayed observation

    def step(self, action):
        # Add action to buffer
        self.act_buffer.append(action)

        # Execute delayed action
        if len(self.act_buffer) > self.act_delay:
            actual_action = self.act_buffer[0]
        else:
            actual_action = np.zeros_like(action)  # Default action during warmup

        obs, reward, terminated, truncated, info = self.env.step(actual_action)

        # Add observation to buffer
        self.obs_buffer.append(obs)

        # Return delayed observation
        return self.obs_buffer[0], reward, terminated, truncated, info

Financial Sim-to-Real: Backtesting vs Live Trading

The sim-to-real gap in finance manifests as the difference between backtesting and live trading.

Key Challenges

Challenge Description Mitigation
Slippage Order fills at worse prices than expected Model slippage explicitly in simulation
Market impact Large orders move prices Use volume-weighted execution, limit order size
Latency Delayed data feeds and execution Include realistic latency in backtests
Regime changes Market conditions shift (e.g., volatility spikes) Train on multiple market regimes, use online adaptation
Lookahead bias Accidentally using future data Strict event-driven backtesting framework

Modeling Slippage

import numpy as np

class SlippageModel:
    """
    Realistic slippage model for backtesting.
    Slippage increases with order size and volatility.
    """
    def __init__(self, base_slippage_bps=5, volume_impact=0.01):
        self.base_slippage_bps = base_slippage_bps  # Base slippage in basis points
        self.volume_impact = volume_impact           # Impact per 1% of daily volume

    def calculate_fill_price(self, desired_price, order_size, daily_volume, direction):
        """
        Calculate actual fill price including slippage.

        Args:
            desired_price: Intended execution price
            order_size: Number of shares to trade
            daily_volume: Average daily trading volume
            direction: 1 for buy, -1 for sell
        """
        # Base slippage
        slippage_pct = self.base_slippage_bps / 10000

        # Volume impact (trading 1% of daily volume adds 0.01% slippage)
        volume_fraction = order_size / daily_volume
        slippage_pct += self.volume_impact * volume_fraction

        # Random component (bid-ask bounce)
        slippage_pct += np.random.normal(0, 0.0002)  # ±2 bps noise

        # Apply slippage (worse price for buys, worse for sells)
        fill_price = desired_price * (1 + direction * slippage_pct)

        return fill_price

# Example: Backtest with slippage
class TradingEnvWithSlippage(gym.Env):
    def __init__(self, price_data, initial_cash=100000):
        self.prices = price_data
        self.cash = initial_cash
        self.position = 0
        self.slippage_model = SlippageModel()
        self.current_step = 0

    def step(self, action):
        # action: fraction of portfolio to allocate (-1 to 1)
        current_price = self.prices[self.current_step]
        portfolio_value = self.cash + self.position * current_price

        target_position = int(action * portfolio_value / current_price)
        order_size = abs(target_position - self.position)
        direction = 1 if target_position > self.position else -1

        if order_size > 0:
            # Calculate fill price with slippage
            daily_volume = 1000000  # Example: 1M shares/day
            fill_price = self.slippage_model.calculate_fill_price(
                current_price, order_size, daily_volume, direction
            )

            # Execute trade
            cost = order_size * fill_price
            self.cash -= direction * cost
            self.position = target_position

        # Move to next step
        self.current_step += 1
        reward = (self.cash + self.position * self.prices[self.current_step]) - portfolio_value
        terminated = self.current_step >= len(self.prices) - 1

        return self._get_obs(), reward, terminated, False, {}

    def _get_obs(self):
        return np.array([self.position, self.cash, self.prices[self.current_step]])

Handling Regime Changes

Train on multiple market regimes (bull, bear, high volatility) and use context-aware policies:

class RegimeAwarePolicy(nn.Module):
    """
    Policy that adapts to different market regimes.
    Uses volatility as regime indicator.
    """
    def __init__(self, obs_dim, act_dim, hidden_dim=64):
        super().__init__()
        self.regime_encoder = nn.Sequential(
            nn.Linear(1, 32),  # Input: volatility estimate
            nn.ReLU()
        )
        self.policy_net = nn.Sequential(
            nn.Linear(obs_dim + 32, hidden_dim),
            nn.ReLU(),
            nn.Linear(hidden_dim, act_dim),
            nn.Tanh()
        )

    def forward(self, obs, volatility):
        regime_embedding = self.regime_encoder(volatility.unsqueeze(-1))
        combined = torch.cat([obs, regime_embedding], dim=-1)
        return self.policy_net(combined)

Robotics Sim-to-Real: Tools and Pipeline

Modern Simulation Platforms

Platform Strengths Use Case
Isaac Gym GPU-accelerated, massive parallelism (1000s envs) Large-scale RL training
MuJoCo Accurate contact dynamics, fast Manipulation, locomotion
PyBullet Free, easy to use, ROS integration Prototyping, education
Gazebo ROS native, sensor simulation Full robot system testing

Example: Isaac Gym Domain Randomization

# Pseudocode for Isaac Gym randomization
from isaacgym import gymapi

def create_randomized_env(gym, sim, env_idx):
    """
    Create environment with randomized parameters.
    """
    # Randomize object mass
    object_props = gymapi.RigidBodyProperties()
    object_props.mass = np.random.uniform(0.1, 2.0)

    # Randomize friction
    object_props.friction = np.random.uniform(0.5, 1.5)

    # Randomize visual appearance
    color = gymapi.Vec3(np.random.rand(), np.random.rand(), np.random.rand())

    # Create actor with randomized properties
    actor_handle = gym.create_actor(env_idx, object_asset, 
                                     object_props, color)

    return actor_handle

Real Robot Deployment Pipeline

  1. Train in simulation (Isaac Gym / MuJoCo) with domain randomization
  2. System identification on real robot (calibrate key parameters)
  3. Safe policy evaluation using safety wrappers and human supervision
  4. Collect real-world data (1-2 hours of robot operation)
  5. Fine-tune policy on real data using small learning rate
  6. Iterate: Improve simulation based on failure modes observed in reality

Future Directions

World Models

World models learn a predictive model of the environment, enabling policy training in the learned model instead of the true simulator. This reduces the sim-to-real gap if the world model is learned from real data.

import torch
import torch.nn as nn

class WorldModel(nn.Module):
    """
    Simple world model: predicts next state given current state and action.
    Train on real-world data, then use for policy optimization.
    """
    def __init__(self, state_dim, action_dim, hidden_dim=128):
        super().__init__()
        self.net = nn.Sequential(
            nn.Linear(state_dim + action_dim, hidden_dim),
            nn.ReLU(),
            nn.Linear(hidden_dim, hidden_dim),
            nn.ReLU(),
            nn.Linear(hidden_dim, state_dim)
        )

    def forward(self, state, action):
        """Predict next state."""
        x = torch.cat([state, action], dim=-1)
        delta = self.net(x)
        return state + delta  # Predict state delta for stability

    def train_on_real_data(self, real_transitions, epochs=50):
        """Train world model on real (s, a, s') tuples."""
        optimizer = torch.optim.Adam(self.parameters(), lr=1e-3)

        for epoch in range(epochs):
            for s, a, s_next in real_transitions:
                pred_next = self.forward(s, a)
                loss = nn.MSELoss()(pred_next, s_next)

                optimizer.zero_grad()
                loss.backward()
                optimizer.step()

Model-Based RL

Combine learned dynamics models with planning (e.g., Model Predictive Control) for safer deployment:

class MPCController:
    """
    Model Predictive Control using learned world model.
    Plans actions over horizon, executes first action, replans.
    """
    def __init__(self, world_model, horizon=10, num_samples=100):
        self.world_model = world_model
        self.horizon = horizon
        self.num_samples = num_samples

    def plan(self, current_state, reward_fn):
        """Find best action sequence via random shooting."""
        best_return = -float('inf')
        best_action_seq = None

        for _ in range(self.num_samples):
            # Sample random action sequence
            action_seq = torch.randn(self.horizon, self.action_dim)

            # Rollout in world model
            state = current_state
            total_reward = 0

            for t in range(self.horizon):
                state = self.world_model(state, action_seq[t])
                total_reward += reward_fn(state, action_seq[t])

            if total_reward > best_return:
                best_return = total_reward
                best_action_seq = action_seq

        return best_action_seq[0]  # Return first action only

Offline RL for Safer Deployment

Offline RL trains policies purely from pre-collected datasets, avoiding risky online exploration:

from stable_baselines3 import CQL  # Conservative Q-Learning

# Train on logged data (no environment interaction)
offline_dataset = load_real_world_trajectories()  # (s, a, r, s') tuples
model = CQL('MlpPolicy', offline_dataset, verbose=1)
model.learn(total_timesteps=100000)

# Deploy trained policy (no online training needed)
model.save('offline_policy')

Offline RL is promising for high-stakes domains (robotics, healthcare, finance) where exploration is expensive or dangerous.

Conclusion

The sim-to-real gap is the final boss of reinforcement learning deployment. While simulation provides a safe, fast training ground, real-world success requires bridging the inevitable discrepancies through:

  • Domain randomization: Training robust policies that generalize across parameter variations
  • System identification: Calibrating simulators to match real-world dynamics
  • Transfer learning: Leveraging simulation while adapting to real data
  • Deployment best practices: Safety wrappers, action smoothing, latency handling

For financial applications, the gap manifests as backtesting vs live trading—requiring explicit slippage modeling, regime awareness, and conservative risk management. For robotics, modern tools like Isaac Gym and MuJoCo, combined with careful real-world fine-tuning, enable increasingly reliable deployment.

Emerging techniques—world models, model-based RL, offline RL—promise to further narrow the gap by learning directly from limited real-world data or enabling safer policy optimization.

Throughout this 6-part series, we’ve journeyed from the theoretical foundations of MDPs to the practical realities of deploying RL in the wild. The path from simulation to reality is challenging, but with the right tools and techniques, reinforcement learning is ready to solve real-world problems at scale.

Thank you for following along. Now go build something amazing—and remember to test it in the real world!

Deep Reinforcement Learning: From Theory to Custom Environments Series (6/6)

Related Posts

Reinforcement LearningFine-Tuning Pretrained RL Agents: Transfer Learning from Atari to Custom Tasks with Stable Baselines3Fine-tuning DQN from Atari Pong to a custom obstacle variant: replay buffer pitfalls, exploration tuning, and why transfer learning in RL is harder than CNNs.2026.02.05Reinforcement LearningPart 5: Reward Engineering: How to Shape Behaviors in Financial/Robotic TasksMaster reward function design for RL: potential-based shaping, risk-adjusted trading rewards, sparse vs dense robotics rewards, curriculum learning, and intrinsic motivation.2026.01.26Game AI with Reinforcement LearningPolicy Gradient Methods: PPO and A3C for Complex Game EnvironmentsWhy DQN fails for continuous control, how actor-critic methods reduce variance, and why PPO became the de facto standard for game AI and robotics.2025.11.26Reinforcement LearningExploration vs Exploitation 딜레마 완벽 정리: ε-greedy부터 UCB, Thompson Sampling, RND까지 탐색 전략 비교와 구현ε-greedy부터 UCB, Thompson Sampling, ICM, RND까지 강화학습 탐색 전략을 체계적으로 비교하고 희소 보상 환경 최적화를 위한 실전 구현 가이드를 제공합니다.2025.12.29

Did you find this helpful?

☕ Buy me a coffee

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

TODAY 360 | TOTAL 2,583